Cells (Sep 2023)

Circulating Tumor Cell Subpopulations Predict Treatment Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Patients

  • Ian M. Freed,
  • Anup Kasi,
  • Oluwadamilola Fateru,
  • Mengjia Hu,
  • Phasin Gonzalez,
  • Nyla Weatherington,
  • Harsh Pathak,
  • Stephen Hyter,
  • Weijing Sun,
  • Raed Al-Rajabi,
  • Joaquina Baranda,
  • Mateusz L. Hupert,
  • Prabhakar Chalise,
  • Andrew K. Godwin,
  • Malgorzata A. Witek,
  • Steven A. Soper

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182266
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 18
p. 2266

Abstract

Read online

There is a high clinical unmet need to improve outcomes for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, either with the discovery of new therapies or biomarkers that can track response to treatment more efficiently than imaging. We report an innovative approach that will generate renewed interest in using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to monitor treatment efficacy, which, in this case, used PDAC patients receiving an exploratory new therapy, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi)—niraparib—as a case study. CTCs were enumerated from whole blood using a microfluidic approach that affinity captures epithelial and mesenchymal CTCs using anti-EpCAM and anti-FAPα monoclonal antibodies, respectively. These antibodies were poised on the surface of two separate microfluidic devices to discretely capture each subpopulation for interrogation. The isolated CTCs were enumerated using immunophenotyping to produce a numerical ratio consisting of the number of mesenchymal to epithelial CTCs (denoted “Φ”), which was used as an indicator of response to therapy, as determined using computed tomography (CT). A decreasing value of Φ during treatment was indicative of tumor response to the PARPi and was observed in 88% of the enrolled patients (n = 31). Changes in Φ during longitudinal testing were a better predictor of treatment response than the current standard CA19-9. We were able to differentiate between responders and non-responders using ΔΦ (p = 0.0093) with higher confidence than CA19-9 (p = 0.033). For CA19-9 non-producers, ΔΦ correctly predicted the outcome in 72% of the PDAC patients. Sequencing of the gDNA extracted from affinity-selected CTC subpopulations provided information that could be used for patient enrollment into the clinical trial based on their tumor mutational status in DNA repair genes.

Keywords