Trials (Jul 2024)

Role of central endpoint adjudication and challenges in trials on neonatal sepsis—a case of ProSPoNS trial

  • Anju Pradhan Sinha,
  • Dilip Raja,
  • Kamlesh S. Mahajan,
  • Piyu Sharma,
  • Subodh S. Gupta,
  • Ramesh Poluru,
  • Anand S. Kawade,
  • Girish Dayma,
  • Sunil Sazawal,
  • Ashish Bavdekar,
  • Sailajanandan Parida,
  • Sushma Nangia,
  • Abhishek V. Raut,
  • Adhisivam Bethou,
  • Prabhabati Devi,
  • Makrand Gorpade,
  • Tharika Fatima,
  • Rashmita Nayak,
  • Arti Kapil,
  • Mohd. Azam,
  • Pearlin A. Khan,
  • Ravindra Mohan Pandey,
  • Narendra Kumar Arora,
  • ProSPoNS Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08298-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Despite progress in reducing the infant mortality in India, the neonatal mortality decline has been slower, necessitating concerted efforts to achieve Sustainable Development Goal-3. A promising strategy aiming to prevent neonatal sepsis in high-risk, vulnerable, low birth weight neonates through an innovative intervention includes probiotic supplementation. This article communicates the decision by the ProSPoNS trial investigators to establish a Central Endpoint Adjudication Committee (CEAC) as an addendum to the protocol published in Trials in 2021 for the purpose of clarifying the primary outcome. In the published protocol, the study hypothesis and primary objective are based on “sepsis,” the primary outcome has been specified as sepsis/PSBI, whereas the sample size estimation was performed based on the “physician diagnosed sepsis.” To align all the three above, the investigators meeting, held on 17th–18th August 2023, at MGIMS Sevagram, Wardha, deliberated and unanimously agreed that “physician diagnosed sepsis” is the primary study outcome which includes sepsis/PSBI. The CEAC, chaired by an external subject expert and members including trial statistician, a microbiologist, and all site principal investigators will employ four criteria to determine “physician diagnosed sepsis”: (1) blood culture status, (2) sepsis screen status, (3) PSBI/non-PSBI signs and symptoms, and (4) the clinical course for each sickness event. Importantly, this clarification maintains consistency with the approved study protocol (Protocol No. 5/7/915/2012 version 3.1 dated 14 Feb 2020), emphasizing the commitment to methodological transparency and adherence to predefined standards. The decision to utilize the guidance of a CEAC is recommended as the gold standard in multicentric complex clinical trials to achieve consistency and accuracy in assessment of outcomes. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) CTRI/2019/05/019197. Registered on 16 May 2019.

Keywords