Italian Journal of Pediatrics (Dec 2023)

Using the center of pressure movement analysis in evaluating spontaneous movements in infants: a comparative study with general movements assessment

  • Halil Ibrahim Celik,
  • Ayse Yildiz,
  • Ramazan Yildiz,
  • Akmer Mutlu,
  • Ruhi Soylu,
  • Kivilcim Gucuyener,
  • Aysu Duyan-Camurdan,
  • Esin Koc,
  • Eray Esra Onal,
  • Bulent Elbasan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-023-01568-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 49, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Researchers have attempted to automate the spontaneous movement assessment and have sought quantitative and objective methods over the past decade. The purpose of the study was to present a quantitative assessment method of spontaneous movement using center-of-pressure (COP) movement analysis. Methods A total of 101 infants were included in the study. The infants were placed in the supine position on the force plate with the cranial-caudal orientation. In this position, the recording of video and COP movement data were made simultaneously for 3 min. Video recordings were used to observe global and detailed general movement assessment (GMA), and COP time series data were used to obtain quantitative movement parameters. Results According to the global GMA, 13 infants displayed absent fidgety movements (FMs) and 88 infants displayed normal FMs. The binary logistic regression model indicated significant association between global GMA and COP movement parameters (chi-square = 20.817, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of this model were 85% (95% CI: 55–98), 83% (95% CI: 73–90), and 83% (95% CI: 74–90), respectively. The multiple linear regression model showed a significant association between detailed GMA (motor optimality score-revised/MOS-R) and COP movement parameters (F = 10.349, p < 0.001). The MOS-R total score was predicted with a standard error of approximately 1.8 points (6%). Conclusions The present study demonstrated the possible avenues for using COP movement analysis to objectively detect the absent FMs and MOS-R total score in clinical settings. Although the method presented in this study requires further validation, it may complement observational GMA and be clinically useful for infant screening purposes, particularly in clinical settings where access to expertise in observational GMA is not available.

Keywords