Experimental Hematology & Oncology (Aug 2024)

Application patterns and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients: a multicenter real-world study in China

  • Hongye Gao,
  • Zhuoxin Zhang,
  • Jiali Wang,
  • Yannan Jia,
  • Yawei Zheng,
  • Xiaolei Pei,
  • Weihua Zhai,
  • Rongli Zhang,
  • Xin Chen,
  • Qiaoling Ma,
  • Jialin Wei,
  • Donglin Yang,
  • Aiming Pang,
  • Yi He,
  • Sizhou Feng,
  • Hao Zhang,
  • Xin Du,
  • Xianmin Song,
  • Yao Liu,
  • Dehui Zou,
  • Erlie Jiang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00557-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The optimal timing and type of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for treating peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remain controversial. This retrospective real-world study investigated the application pattern and outcomes of HSCT in China. The analysis encompassed 408 PTCL patients with a median age of 45.5 years, all of whom received initial adequate therapy at five hospitals. Among patients with nodal PTCL who responded effectively to first-line therapy (the “responders”, n = 127) and subsequently underwent HSCT consolidation (n = 47, 37.0%), 93.6% received auto-HSCT, while 6.4% underwent allo-HSCT. Front-line auto-HSCT showed potential for long-term disease control in nodal PTCL responders. Among non-nodal PTCL responders (n = 80) with HSCT (n = 26, 32.5%), 46.2% underwent allo-HSCT and 53.8% received auto-HSCT. Upfront allo-HSCT provides longer progression-free survival (PFS) for non-nodal PTCL responders, with lower 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (16.7% vs. 56.0%) and comparable non-relapse mortality (NRM) (10.4% vs. 11.0%) compared to auto-HSCT. For patients who achieved remission with second-line salvage regimens, allo-HSCT was the primary choice (82.4%) for non-nodal PTCL, while auto-HSCT was more common (82.4%) in nodal PTCL. Nodal PTCL patients underwent auto-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines of treatment had a higher 3-year CIR (81.0%) compared to those treated in the first (26.0%) or second line (26.0%). Non-nodal PTCL patients underwent allo-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines had a higher 3-year NRM (37.5%) compared to after first (10.4%) or second line treatment (8.5%). These findings highlight distinct HSCT application patterns for PTCL in China, emphasizing the impact of early disease control and upfront consolidative HSCT.

Keywords