Heat wave characteristics: evaluation of regional climate model performances for Germany

Abstract

Heat waves are among the most severe climate extreme events. In this study, we address the impact of increased model resolution and tailored model settings on the reproduction of these events by evaluating different regional climate model outputs for Germany and its near surroundings between 1980–2009. Outputs of an ensemble of six EURO-CORDEX models with 12.5 km grid resolution and outputs from a high-resolution (5 km) WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) model run are employed. The latter was especially tailored for the study region regarding the physics configuration. We analyze the reproduction of the maximum temperature, number of heat wave days, heat wave characteristics (frequency, duration and intensity), the 2003 major event, and trends in the annual number of heat waves. E-OBS is used as the reference, and we utilize the Taylor diagram, the Mann–Kendall trend test and the spatial efficiency metric, while the cumulative heat index is used as a measure of intensity. Averaged over the domain, heat waves occurred about 31 times in the study period, with an average duration of 4 d and an average heat excess of 10 ∘C. The maximum temperature was only reproduced satisfactorily by some models. Despite using the same forcing, the models exhibited a large spread in heat wave reproduction. The domain mean conditions for heat wave frequency and duration were captured reasonably well, but the intensity was reproduced weakly. The spread was particularly pronounced for the 2003 event, indicating how difficult it was for the models to reproduce single major events. All models underestimated the spatial extent of the observed increasing trends. WRF generally did not perform significantly better than the other models. We conclude that increasing the model resolution does not add significant value to heat wave simulation if the base resolution is already relatively high. Tailored model settings seem to play a minor role. The sometimes pronounced differences in performance, however, highlight that the choice of model can be crucial.