AgriEngineering (Sep 2023)

Bedding Management for Suppressing Particulate Matter in Cage-Free Hen Houses

  • Ramesh Bahadur Bist,
  • Prafulla Regmi,
  • Darrin Karcher,
  • Yangyang Guo,
  • Amit Kumar Singh,
  • Casey W. Ritz,
  • Woo Kyun Kim,
  • Deana R. Jones,
  • Lilong Chai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040103
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 4
pp. 1663 – 1676

Abstract

Read online

Cage-free (CF) layer houses tend to have high particulate matter (PM) levels because of bedding/litter floor and the birds’ activities, such as perching, dustbathing, and foraging on it. It has been reported that optimizing bedding management can potentially suppress PM levels in CF houses. The objectives of this study were to (1) test the effect of the top application of new bedding materials (BMs) on PM levels and (2) compare different BM PM reduction efficiencies. Small flake shavings (SFS), large flake shavings (LFS), and aspen wood chips (AWC) were top-dressed on the surface of the original litter (33-week-old litter) evenly in each of the BM treatment rooms at 20% volume of the original litter floor. The initial litter depths in the control, SFS, LFS, and AWC rooms were 4.6 ± 0.6, 4.8 ± 0.8 cm, 4.8 ± 0.8 cm, and 4.6 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. One room was used as a control without adding new BM. The results indicate that the top application of new bedding suppressed PM levels in all treatment rooms (p 2.5 reductions in the SFS, AWC, and LFS treatment rooms were 36.5%, 34.6%, and 28.9% greater than in the control room, respectively. The mitigation efficiencies were different between PM sizes. For instance, PM2.5, PM10, and TSP in the SFS room were lower than in the control room by 36.5%, 39.4%, and 38.7%, respectively. For litter quality, the moisture content was 18.0 ± 2.8, 20.0 ± 3.1, 20.6 ± 2.4, and 19.7 ± 4.2% in the control, SFS, LFS, and AWC rooms, respectively. Treatment rooms with 20% new BM had 10% higher litter moisture than the control room. The findings of this study reveal that the top application of new bedding on old litter is a potential strategy for reducing PM generation in CF houses. Further studies are warranted, such as regarding the effect of different ratios of new bedding on PM reduction, cost analysis, and verification tests in commercial CF houses.

Keywords