PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (Jul 2021)

Molecular approach to the epidemiology of urinary schistosomiasis in France.

  • Marie-Laure Gillardie,
  • Oussama Babba,
  • Caroline Mahinc,
  • Maureen Duthel,
  • Claire de Bengy,
  • Clotilde Morineaud,
  • Elisabeth Rivollier,
  • Pierre Flori

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009515
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 7
p. e0009515

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis is based on the complementarity of serological technique and microscopic examination (ME). Between 2015 and 2019, the number of urinary schistosomiasis tests received in our laboratory increased sharply from 300 to 900 per year. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate the reliability of urine microscopic examination (ME, reference and routine technique) from urine sample by comparing it to other techniques (antigenic technique and PCR). To this end, we optimized two real-time PCRs targeting respectively Schistosoma haematobium (Sh) and Schistosoma mansoni (Sm).Methodology/principal findings914 urine samples from 846 patients suspected of urogenital schistosomiasis were prescribed and analyzed by PCR and also by antigenic technique for the first 143 samples. The antigenic technique evaluated was Schisto POC-CCA, Rapid Medical Diagnostics. These results (antigenic technique and PCR) were compared to ME which was performed from all urines. The percentage of 14% (128/914) positive cases with the PCR technique and the percentage of 6.0% (54/914) positive cases with ME is significantly different (Chi 2 test, pConclusion/significanceTargeted Sh and Sm PCRs in urine are reliable techniques compared to ME (reference technique). In view of our results, we decided to screen urinary schistosomiasis by direct ME always coupled by the PCR technique, which has shown better reliability criteria.