Reduced neurovascular coupling of the visual network in migraine patients with aura as revealed with arterial spin labeling MRI: is there a demand-supply mismatch behind the scenes?

Abstract

Abstract Background Although neuroimaging investigations have consistently demonstrated that “hyperresponsive” and “hyperconnected” visual cortices may represent the functional substrate of cortical spreading depolarization in patients with migraine with aura, the mechanisms which underpin the brain “tendency” to ignite the cortical spreading depolarization and, consequently, aura phenomenon are still matter of debate. Considering that triggers able to induce aura phenomenon constrain brain to increase global (such as physical activity, stressors and sleep abnormalities) or local (such as bright light visual stimulations) energy demand, a vascular supply unable to satisfy the increased energy requirement could be hypothesized in these patients. Methods Twenty-three patients with migraine with aura, 25 patients with migraine without aura and 20 healthy controls underwent a 3-Tesla MRI study. Cerebral blood flow and local functional connectivity (regional homogeneity) maps were obtained and registered to the MNI space where 100 cortical regions were derived using a functional local-global normative parcellation. A surrogate estimate of the regional neurovascular coupling for each subject was obtained at each parcel from the correlation coefficient between the z-scored ReHo map and the z-scored cerebral blood flow maps. Results A significantly higher regional cerebral blood flow across the visual cortex of both hemispheres (i.e. fusiform and lingual gyri) was detected in migraine with aura patients when compared to patients with migraine without aura (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). Concomitantly, a significantly reduced neurovascular coupling (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected) in the primary visual cortex parcel (VIS-4) of the large-scale visual network was observed in the left hemisphere of patients with migraine with aura (0.23±0.03), compared to both patients with migraine without aura (0.32±0.05) and healthy controls (0.29±0.05). Conclusions Visual cortex neurovascular “decoupling” might represent the “link” between the exposure to trigger factors and aura phenomenon ignition. While physiological vascular oversupply may compensate neurovascular demand-supply at rest, it becomes inadequate in case of increased energy demand (e.g. when patients face with trigger factors) paving the way to the aura phenomenon ignition in patients with migraine with aura. Whether preventive treatments may exert their therapeutic activity on migraine with aura restoring the energy demands and cerebral blood flow trade-off within the visual network should be further investigated.

Keywords

• Migraine with aura
• Arterial spin labeling
• Neurovascular-coupling