Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Sep 2021)

Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Transvalvular Pressure Gradient in Aortic Stenosis

  • Benedikt Franke,
  • Jan Brüning,
  • Pavlo Yevtushenko,
  • Henryk Dreger,
  • Henryk Dreger,
  • Anna Brand,
  • Anna Brand,
  • Benjamin Juri,
  • Axel Unbehaun,
  • Axel Unbehaun,
  • Jörg Kempfert,
  • Simon Sündermann,
  • Simon Sündermann,
  • Alexander Lembcke,
  • Natalia Solowjowa,
  • Sebastian Kelle,
  • Volkmar Falk,
  • Titus Kuehne,
  • Titus Kuehne,
  • Titus Kuehne,
  • Leonid Goubergrits,
  • Leonid Goubergrits,
  • Marie Schafstedde,
  • Marie Schafstedde,
  • Marie Schafstedde,
  • Marie Schafstedde

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.706628
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Background: In patients with aortic stenosis, computed tomography (CT) provides important information about cardiovascular anatomy for treatment planning but is limited in determining relevant hemodynamic parameters such as the transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG).Purpose: In the present study, we aimed to validate a reduced-order model method for assessing TPG in aortic stenosis using CT data.Methods: TPGCT was calculated using a reduced-order model requiring the patient-specific peak-systolic aortic flow rate (Q) and the aortic valve area (AVA). AVA was determined by segmentation of the aortic valve leaflets, whereas Q was quantified based on volumetric assessment of the left ventricle. For validation, invasively measured TPGcatheter was calculated from pressure measurements in the left ventricle and the ascending aorta. Altogether, 84 data sets of patients with aortic stenosis were used to compare TPGCT against TPGcatheter.Results: TPGcatheter and TPGCT were 50.6 ± 28.0 and 48.0 ± 26 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.56). A Bland–Altman analysis revealed good agreement between both methods with a mean difference in TPG of 2.6 mmHg and a standard deviation of 19.3 mmHg. Both methods showed good correlation with r = 0.72 (p < 0.001).Conclusions: The presented CT-based method allows assessment of TPG in patients with aortic stenosis, extending the current capabilities of cardiac CT for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Keywords