BMJ Open (Feb 2023)

Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study

  • Elizabeth Abu-Haydar,
  • George Gwako,
  • Alfred Osoti,
  • Zahida Qureshi,
  • Andrew Secor,
  • Megan E Parker,
  • Jacqueline Opira,
  • Patience Cofie,
  • Chloe Morozoff,
  • Sylvia Deganus,
  • James Soki,
  • Patience Dapaah,
  • Rosemond Owusu,
  • Omondi Ogutu,
  • Gifty Sunkwa-Mills,
  • Martin Boamah,
  • Emmanuel Srofenyoh,
  • Patrick Aboagye,
  • Chris Fofie,
  • Stephen Kaliti,
  • Mutsumi Metzler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066907
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Use of intrauterine balloon tamponades for refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) management has triggered recent debate since effectiveness studies have yielded conflicting results. Implementation research is needed to identify factors influencing successful integration into maternal healthcare packages. The Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) (Ellavi) is a new low-cost, preassembled device for treating refractory PPH.Design A mixed-methods, prospective, implementation research study examining the adoption, sustainability, fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of introducing a newly registered UBT. Cross-sectional surveys were administered post-training and post-use over 10 months.Setting Three Ghanaian (district, regional) and three Kenyan (levels 4–6) healthcare facilities.Participants Obstetric staff (n=451) working within participating facilities.Intervention PPH management training courses were conducted with obstetric staff.Primary and secondary outcome measures Facility measures of adoption, sustainability and fidelity and individual measures of acceptability and feasibility.Results All participating hospitals adopted the device during the study period and the majority (52%–62%) of the employed obstetric staff were trained on the Ellavi; sustainability and fidelity to training content were moderate. The Ellavi was suited for this context due to high delivery and PPH burden. Dynamic training curriculums led by local UBT champions and clear instructions on the packaging yielded positive attitudes and perceptions, and high user confidence, resulting in overall high acceptability. Post-training and post-use, ≥79% of the trainees reported that the Ellavi was easy to use. Potential barriers to use included the lack of adjustable drip stands and difficulties calculating bag height according to blood pressure. Overall, the Ellavi can be feasibly integrated into PPH care and was preferred over condom catheters.Conclusions The training package and time saving Ellavi design facilitated its adoption, acceptability and feasibility. The Ellavi is appropriate and feasible for use among obstetric staff and can be successfully integrated into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package.Trial registration numbers NCT04502173; NCT05340777.