Cancer Cell International (Sep 2024)

Sialylation-associated long non-coding RNA signature predicts the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy and chemotherapy options in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma

  • Jun Chen,
  • Tingting Wu,
  • Yongwen Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03486-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Sialylation in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) differs significantly from apoptotic and ferroptosis pathways. It plays a crucial role in cancer progression and immune response modulation. Exploring how sialylation affects tumor behavior and its link with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may provide new insights into UCEC prognosis and treatment. Methods We obtained RNA transcriptome, clinical, and mutation data of UCEC samples from the TCGA database. Our approach involved developing a risk model based on the co-expression patterns of sialylation genes and lncRNAs. Prognostic lncRNAs were identified through Cox regression and further refined using LASSO analysis. To understand the biological functions and pathways of model-associated differentially expressed genes (MADEGs), we conducted enrichment analyses. We also assessed the immune infiltration status of MADEGs using eight different algorithms, which helped in evaluating the potential for immunotherapy. Additionally, we validated the expression of these lncRNAs in UCEC using cell lines and clinical samples. Results We developed a UCEC risk model using five sialylation-related lncRNAs (AC004884.2, AC026202.2, LINC01579, LINC00942, SLC16A1-AS1). This model, confirmed through Cox analysis and clinical evaluation, effectively predicted patient outcomes. Survival data analysis across entire cohort, as well as within training and test groups, indicated better survival in low-risk UCEC patients. Enrichment analyses linked MADEGs to sialylation functions and cancer pathways. High-risk patients showed increased responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as indicated by immunological assessments. Subgroup C2 patients showed superior outcomes and a robust response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Notably, LINC01579, LINC00942, and SLC16A1-AS1 were significantly overexpressed in UCEC clinical tumor samples as well as in Ishikawa and HEC-1-B cell lines, compared to the normal groups. Conclusions This lncRNA signature associated with sialylation could guide prognosis, enhance the understanding of molecular mechanisms, and inform treatment strategies in UCEC. It highlights the potential for the use of ICIs and chemotherapy.

Keywords