Biogeosciences (Jun 2011)

Origin and fate of the secondary nitrite maximum in the Arabian Sea

  • P. Lam,
  • M. M. Jensen,
  • A. Kock,
  • K. A. Lettmann,
  • Y. Plancherel,
  • G. Lavik,
  • H. W. Bange,
  • M. M. M. Kuypers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1565-2011
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 6
pp. 1565 – 1577

Abstract

Read online

The Arabian Sea harbours one of the three major oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the world's oceans, and it alone is estimated to account for ~10–20 % of global oceanic nitrogen (N) loss. While actual rate measurements have been few, the consistently high accumulation of nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup>) coinciding with suboxic conditions in the central-northeastern part of the Arabian Sea has led to the general belief that this is the region where active N-loss takes place. Most subsequent field studies on N-loss have thus been drawn almost exclusively to the central-NE. However, a recent study measured only low to undetectable N-loss activities in this region, compared to orders of magnitude higher rates measured towards the Omani Shelf where little NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> accumulated (Jensen et al., 2011). In this paper, we further explore this discrepancy by comparing the NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup>-producing and consuming processes, and examining the relationship between the overall NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> balance and active N-loss in the Arabian Sea. Based on a combination of <sup>15</sup>N-incubation experiments, functional gene expression analyses, nutrient profiling and flux modeling, our results showed that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> accumulated in the central-NE Arabian Sea due to a net production via primarily active nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&minus;</sup>) reduction and to a certain extent ammonia oxidation. Meanwhile, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> consumption via anammox, denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) were hardly detectable in this region, though some loss to NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> oxidation was predicted from modeled NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> changes. No significant correlation was found between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> and N-loss rates (<i>p</i>>0.05). This discrepancy between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> accumulation and lack of active N-loss in the central-NE Arabian Sea is best explained by the deficiency of labile organic matter that is directly needed for further NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> reduction to N<sub>2</sub>O, N<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and indirectly for the remineralized NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> required by anammox. Altogether, our data do not support the long-held view that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> accumulation is a direct activity indicator of N-loss in the Arabian Sea or other OMZs. Instead, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&minus;</sup> accumulation more likely corresponds to long-term integrated N-loss that has passed the prime of high and/or consistent in situ activities.