Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (Jan 2017)

Longitudinal evaluation of criteria for subjective cognitive decline and preclinical Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic sample

  • Marie Eckerström,
  • Mattias Göthlin,
  • Sindre Rolstad,
  • Erik Hessen,
  • Carl Eckerström,
  • Arto Nordlund,
  • Boo Johansson,
  • Johan Svensson,
  • Michael Jonsson,
  • Simona Sacuiu,
  • Anders Wallin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.006
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 96 – 107

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and biomarker‐based “at‐risk” concepts such as “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been developed to predict AD dementia before objective cognitive impairment is detectable. We longitudinally evaluated cognitive outcome when using these classifications. Methods Memory clinic patients (n = 235) were classified as SCD (n = 122): subtle cognitive decline (n = 36) and mild cognitive impairment (n = 77) and subsequently subclassified into SCDplus and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA‐AA) stages 0 to 3. Mean (standard deviation) follow‐up time was 48 (35) months. Proportion declining cognitively and prognostic accuracy for cognitive decline was calculated for all classifications. Results Among SCDplus patients, 43% to 48% declined cognitively. Among NIA‐AA stage 1 to 3 patients, 50% to 100% declined cognitively. The highest positive likelihood ratios (+LRs) for subsequent cognitive decline (+LR 6.3), dementia (+LR 3.4), and AD dementia (+LR 6.5) were found for NIA‐AA stage 2. Discussion In a memory clinic setting, NIA‐AA stage 2 seems to be the most successful classification in predicting objective cognitive decline, dementia, and AD dementia.

Keywords