JMIR Cancer (Jan 2022)

The Use of Telemedicine in Cancer Clinical Trials: Connect-Patient-to-Doctor Prospective Study

  • Yasmine Meghiref,
  • Charles Parnot,
  • Claire Duverger,
  • Françoise Lilly Difoum,
  • Audrey Gourden,
  • Halima Yssaad,
  • Caroline Leiterer,
  • Caroline Bedekovic,
  • Julien Blanchard,
  • Houria Nait Ammar,
  • Antoine Schernberg,
  • Hélène Vanquaethem,
  • Carole Helissey

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/31255
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
p. e31255

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTelemedicine is currently being adopted for the management of patients in routine care. However, its use remains limited in the context of clinical trials. ObjectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of telemonitoring and patient-reported outcomes collection in the context of clinical trials. MethodsThe patients who were included in an interventional oncology clinical trial were eligible. The patients were registered with a digital tool to respond to a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire (ePRO) based on CTCAE (The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, National Cancer Institute), version 5.0, personalized to their pathology and treatment. An algorithm evaluated the health status of the patient based on the reported adverse events, with a classification in 4 different states (correct, compromise, state to be monitored, or critical state). The main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of remote monitoring via a connected platform of patients included in a clinical trial. ResultsFrom July 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, 39 patients were included. The median age was 71 years (range 41-94); 74% (n=29) were male, and 59% (n=23) had metastatic disease. Out of the 969 ePRO questionnaires completed over the course of the study, 77.0% (n=746) were classified as “correct,” 10.9% (n=106) as “compromised,” and 12.1% (n=117) as “to be monitored” or “critical.” The median response time was 7 days (IQR 7-15.5), and 76% (25/33) of the patients were compliant. Out of the 35 patients who answered a satisfaction questionnaire, 95% (n=33) were satisfied or very satisfied with the tool, and 85% (n=30) were satisfied with their relationship with the health care team. There were 5 unscheduled hospitalizations during the study period. ConclusionsRemote monitoring in clinical trials is feasible, with a high level of patient participation and satisfaction. It benefits patients, but it also ensures the high quality of the trial through the early management of adverse events and better knowledge of the tolerance profile of experimental treatments. This e-technology will likely be deployed more widely in our clinical trials.