Semina: Ciências Agrárias (Jun 2014)

Soil tillage, rice straw and flooded irrigated rice yield

  • Amauri Nelson Beutler ,
  • Janete Denardi Munareto ,
  • Ana Maria Fagundes Greco ,
  • Bruna Canabarro Pozzebon ,
  • Leandro Galon,
  • Sérgio Guimarães,
  • Giovane Burg ,
  • Marcelo Raul Schmidt,
  • Evandro Ademir Deak ,
  • Robson Giacomeli ,
  • Gibran da Silva Alves

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n3p1153
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 35, no. 3
pp. 1153 – 1162

Abstract

Read online

The objective of this study was evaluate the effect of management systems and straw in flooded irrigated rice yield. The experimental design was a completely randomized with three experiments and, 10 replications in experiment 1 and 2 and, 6 replications in experiment 3. The experiments were: E1 – no-till system (E1PD) and conventional system with two harrowings at 0.0–0.07 m layer and leveling with remaplam (E1PC), after three years of sowing rice, after fallow of rice tillage, with sowing of rye grass in winter and grazing; E2 – no-till system (E2PD) and conventional system after native field (E2PC); E3 – no-till without straw on soil surface (E30P), current straw on soil surface of 3,726 kg ha-1 (E31P), two times current straw of 7,452 kg ha-1 (E32P) and three times current straw of 11,178 kg ha-1 (E33P). In soil, were evaluated the average geometric diameter of aggregates, soil bulk density, soil porosity, macro and microporosity, in 0.0-0.05 and 0.05-0.10 m layer. In harvest were evaluated the panicles number in 0,25 m2 area, number of filled, empty an total grains in 10 panicles, mass of one thousand seeds and rice grains yield in 2 m2. The conventional system presented greater macroporosity and total porosity, compared with no-till system, however, does not result in differences in production components and rice grains yield. Soil tillage in no-till, with rice straw on soil surface up to 11,178 kg ha-1, before sowing, not reduces flooded irrigated rice grains yield.

Keywords