International Journal of General Medicine (Aug 2024)
The Loop Technique in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Mengya Dong,1 Chenyuan Liang,1 Gong Cheng2 1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Gong Cheng, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 555 East Youyi Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710054, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86– 18629529996, Email [email protected]: A new approach called the loop technique has been proven safe and effective for repeated intraoperative transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead dislocations during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in a 3-year follow-up. This study aimed to report on the 5-year safety and effectiveness of the loop technique.Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study. Forty-four patients who underwent CRT device implantation at the Cardiology Department of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2013 and June 2019 were included. Data on patient demographics, medical history, laboratory test results, and echocardiography images at admission were collected. The loop technique was performed with repeated intraoperative dislocations of the LV lead. The intraoperative CRT parameters were also recorded. All patients were followed for 5 years. Several auxiliary examinations were performed during follow-up.Results: The 44 patients were divided into the traditional operation group (n=36, 81.8%) and loop technique group (n=8, 18.2%). The baseline patient characteristics were almost balanced. During the 5-year follow-up, 8 (22.2%) patients in the traditional operation group and 2 (25.0%) patients in the loop technique group died. No lead dislocation or other complications related to CRT were observed. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (P=0.87), cardiac function (P=0.56), echocardiographic indices, threshold (P=0.58), or impedance (P=0.22) of the LV lead. There were no significant differences in the threshold and impedance between postoperative, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups in the loop technique group (P=0.53).Conclusion: The loop technique is an ideal solution for repeated intraoperative LV lead dislocation during CRT implantation.Keywords: loop technique, new technique, cardiac resynchronization therapy, left ventricular lead, repeated intraoperative dislocations
