Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Mar 2023)

Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing

  • Karol Curila,
  • Pavel Jurak,
  • Frits Prinzen,
  • Marek Jastrzebski,
  • Petr Waldauf,
  • Josef Halamek,
  • Marketa Tothova,
  • Lucie Znojilova,
  • Radovan Smisek,
  • Radovan Smisek,
  • Jakub Kach,
  • Lukas Poviser,
  • Hana Linkova,
  • Filip Plesinger,
  • Pawel Moskal,
  • Ivo Viscor,
  • Vlastimil Vondra,
  • Pavel Leinveber,
  • Pavel Osmancik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140988
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern.MethodsIn patients with bradycardia, His bundle pacing (HBP), unipolar nonselective LBBP (nsLBBP), aLBBP, and right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) were performed. Timing of local ventricular activation, in leads V1–V8, was displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Durations of local depolarizations were determined as the width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude.ResultsaLBBP was feasible in 63 of 75 consecutive patients with successful nsLBBP. aLBBP significantly improved ventricular dyssynchrony (mean −9 ms; 95% CI (−12;−6) vs. −24 ms (−27;−21), ), p < 0.001) and shortened local depolarization durations in V1–V4 (mean differences −7 ms to −5 ms (−11;−1), p < 0.05) compared to nsLBBP. aLBBP resulted in e-DYS −9 ms (−12; −6) vs. e-DYS 10 ms (7;14), p < 0.001 during HBP. Local depolarization durations in V1–V2 during aLBBP were longer than HBP (differences 5-9 ms (1;14), p < 0.05, with local depolarization duration in V1 during aLBBP being the same as during RVSP (difference 2 ms (−2;6), p = 0.52).ConclusionAlthough aLBBP improved ventricular synchrony and depolarization duration of the septum and RV compared to unipolar nsLBBP, the resultant ventricular depolarization was still less physiological than during HBP.

Keywords