Light quality‐dependent roles of REVEILLE proteins in the circadian system

Abstract

Abstract Several closely related Myb‐like activator proteins are known to have partially redundant functions within the plant circadian clock, but their specific roles are not well understood. To clarify the function of the REVEILLE 4, REVEILLE 6, and REVEILLE 8 transcriptional activators, we characterized the growth and clock phenotypes of CRISPR‐Cas9‐generated single, double, and triple rve mutants. We found that these genes act synergistically to regulate flowering time, redundantly to regulate leaf growth, and antagonistically to regulate hypocotyl elongation. We previously reported that increasing intensities of monochromatic blue and red light have opposite effects on the period of triple rve468 mutants. Here, we further examined light quality‐specific phenotypes of rve mutants and report that rve468 mutants lack the blue light‐specific increase in expression of some circadian clock genes observed in wild type. To investigate the basis of these blue light‐specific circadian phenotypes, we examined RVE protein abundances and degradation rates in blue and red light and found no significant differences between these conditions. We next examined genetic interactions between RVE genes and ZEITLUPE and ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5, two factors with blue light‐specific functions in the clock. We found that the RVEs interact additively with both ZEITLUPE and ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 to regulate circadian period, which suggests that neither of these factors are required for the blue light‐specific differences that we observed. Overall, our results suggest that the RVEs have separable functions in plant growth and circadian regulation and that they are involved in blue light‐specific circadian signaling via a novel mechanism.

Keywords

• Arabidopsis thaliana
• blue light
• flowering time
• hypocotyl elongation
• RVE4, RVE6, RVE8