Veterinary World (Sep 2023)

Epidemiological study of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in healthy free-ranging bantengs (Bos javanicus) and domestic cattle

  • Adithep Konputtar,
  • Montira Yossapol,
  • Tarathip Phaechaiyaphum,
  • Phaphatsorn Manyuen,
  • Nannapas Suetrong,
  • Nuntita Ruksachat,
  • Tarid Purisotayo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1796-1802
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
pp. 1796 – 1802

Abstract

Read online

Background and Aim: Antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms (ARMs) have been increasing among wild animals. Interactions occurring at the interface between wildlife, humans, and livestock can lead to the transmission of ARMs. Thus, the prevalence of ARMs in wild and domestic animals should be determined to address and prevent this issue. This study aimed to determine the resistance patterns of cefotaxime (CTX)-resistant Escherichia coli and identify the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes in ESBL-producing E. coli among a population of wild banteng (Bos javanicus) and domestic cattle kept on farms located close to the Lam Pao non-hunting area, Kalasin province, Thailand. Materials and Methods: Forty-five fecal samples were taken from wild bantengs inhabiting the Lam Pao non-hunting area in Thailand, alongside 15 samples from domestic cattle. Bacterial culture, triple sugar iron, and motile indole lysine tests were conducted to identify E. coli. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted for specific confirmation. MacConkey agar supplemented with 2 μg/mL of CTX was used to identify CTX-resistant E. coli, which would be used to identify ESBL production based on a double-disk synergy test. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing samples were subjected to disk diffusion tests to determine resistant patterns, and the sizes of PCR bands and DNA sequencing were used to differentiate ESBL gene types. Results: All samples tested positive for E. coli. Forty-five isolates from 15 banteng samples and three isolates from one domestic cattle sample displayed CTX-resistant and ESBL-producing traits. The banteng and domestic cattle populations exhibited nine and three distinct resistant patterns, respectively. The PCR results indicated that the banteng isolates harbored the following genes: Cefotaxime-M1 (n = 38), CTX-M9 (n = 5), and the SHV group (n = 2). All three isolates from the domestic cattle sample contained the CTX-M1 gene. Classification of ESBL genes based on the DNA sequences of the banteng isolates showed the characteristics of CTX-M15 (n = 20), CTX-M55 (n = 6), CTX-M14 (n = 5), and CTX-M79 (n = 1). The three domestic cattle isolates exhibited the characteristics of CTX-M15, CTX-M55, and CTX-M79. Conclusion: Despite no previous antibiotic applications, approximately one-third of the banteng samples displayed CTX resistance, indicating ARM contamination within the ecosystem. The similarity in ESBL genes between the banteng and domestic cattle populations suggests potential gene transmissions between these animal groups. However, the initial source of ARMs remains unclear, as the banteng population exhibited more ESBL genes than the domestic cattle, suggesting the possibility of multiple ARM sources. These findings raise concerns because the banteng population inhabits an area that is an important source of freshwater and nourishes the entire north-east region of Thailand and other South-east Asian countries, including Laos, Cambodia, and Southern Vietnam.

Keywords