PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Penalized logistic regression with low prevalence exposures beyond high dimensional settings.

  • Sam Doerken,
  • Marta Avalos,
  • Emmanuel Lagarde,
  • Martin Schumacher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217057
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5
p. e0217057

Abstract

Read online

Estimating and selecting risk factors with extremely low prevalences of exposure for a binary outcome is a challenge because classical standard techniques, markedly logistic regression, often fail to provide meaningful results in such settings. While penalized regression methods are widely used in high-dimensional settings, we were able to show their usefulness in low-dimensional settings as well. Specifically, we demonstrate that Firth correction, ridge, the lasso and boosting all improve the estimation for low-prevalence risk factors. While the methods themselves are well-established, comparison studies are needed to assess their potential benefits in this context. This is done here using the dataset of a large unmatched case-control study from France (2005-2008) about the relationship between prescription medicines and road traffic accidents and an accompanying simulation study. Results show that the estimation of risk factors with prevalences below 0.1% can be drastically improved by using Firth correction and boosting in particular, especially for ultra-low prevalences. When a moderate number of low prevalence exposures is available, we recommend the use of penalized techniques.