Veterinary World (Sep 2022)

Genotypic characterization of mecA gene and antibiogram profile of coagulase-negative staphylococci in subclinical mastitic cows

  • Eman S. Ibrahim,
  • Sohad M. Dorgham,
  • Asmaa S. Mansour,
  • Abeer M. Abdalhamed,
  • Doaa D. Khalaf

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.2186-2191
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 9
pp. 2186 – 2191

Abstract

Read online

Background and Aim: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are becoming the major cause of clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis around the world. This study aims to estimate the prevalence, antibiogram, and frequency of the methicillin-resistant (MR) (mecA) gene in CNS collected from cows with subclinical mastitis. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four milk samples were collected from 20 cows. Fifteen subclinical mastitis samples (∼44.12%) were identified as CNS isolates. The Vitek2 compact system method was employed for the identification of the species. Furthermore, antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed against 10 different antibiotics for CNS strains. The mecA gene from isolated CNS was detected by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Staphylococcus haemolyticus was the most predominant isolated species with an incidence of 33.3% (5/15 isolates), followed by 26.7% for Staphylococcus sciuri and Staphylococcus vitamins (4/15 isolates), and 13.3% for Staphylococcus vitulinus (2/15 isolates), respectively. The highest resistance rates were determined to be 40% (6/15 isolates) against penicillin and oxacillin (OX), 33.3% (5/15 isolates) against clindamycin, 13% (2/15 isolates) against chloramphenicol, amoxicillin, and erythromycin, and 5% (1/15 isolates) against ciprofloxacin, respectively. The results revealed that the isolates were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents, with five isolates displaying multiple antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, the results exhibit that all CNS isolates had the mecA gene at 310 bp with a 100% frequency. Moreover, for detecting MR isolates, there are significant discrepancies between phenotypic and genotypic approaches, and only 6/15 CNS isolates phenotypically demonstrated OX resistance. Conclusion: The results emphasize the necessity of frequent monitoring of phenotypic and genotypic profiles of CNS isolates to ensure effective control measures and the prevention of multidrug resistance strain evolution.

Keywords