International Journal of Integrated Care (Apr 2021)

Barriers and Facilitators in the Uptake of Integrated Care Pathways for Older Patients by Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Analysis of the French National “Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy” Pilot Program

  • Lorette Lorette,
  • Mathieu Calafiore,
  • François Puisieux,
  • Claire Ramez,
  • Fanny Sarrazin,
  • Maxime Lotin,
  • Romain Naessens,
  • Apolline Delesalle,
  • Gracia Adotey,
  • Pascal Harduin,
  • Nathalie Leveque,
  • Delphine Dambre,
  • Marguerite-Marie Defebvre,
  • Carla Di Martino,
  • Jean-Baptiste Beuscart

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5483
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Barriers and Facilitators for Adhesion of Healthcare Professionals in Integrated Care for Older Patients: A Qualitative Assessment Based on the French National Experiment: ‘Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy’ (PAERPA) Introduction: Integrated care is a particularly promising approach in geriatrics – a field in which the medical, psychological and social issues are often complex. The uptake of integrated care by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is essential but varies markedly. The objective of the present study of healthcare professionals was to identify barriers to and facilitators of commitment to integrated care for seniors. Methods: We performed a two-step, qualitative study, comprising (i) six qualitative, semi-directive series of interviews with HCPs (hospital practitioners, family physicians, nurses and pharmacists) who agreed or disagreed to take part in the French national “Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy” (PAERPA) pilot program; and (ii) an analysis of the pooled results, in order to identify common concerns among the healthcare professionals. Results: We identified four key “barrier” and “facilitator” topics shared by HCPs who had committed to the pilot program and those who had not: (i) awareness of and/or interest in geriatric medicine and team working, (ii) the presence of a care coordinator; (iii) the provision of information about the program and about the patient, and communication between HCPs, and (iv) personal benefits for the HCPs and the patients. Key conclusions: The four key topics identified in this large qualitative study of several healthcare professions should be considered during the design and dissemination of integrated care pathways for older patients.

Keywords