Frontiers in Oncology (Nov 2022)

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

  • Sara Fancelli,
  • Sara Fancelli,
  • Enrico Caliman,
  • Enrico Caliman,
  • Francesca Mazzoni,
  • Luca Paglialunga,
  • Marta Rita Gatta Michelet,
  • Daniele Lavacchi,
  • Rossana Berardi,
  • Giulia Mentrasti,
  • Giulio Metro,
  • Ilaria Birocchi,
  • Angelo Delmonte,
  • Ilaria Priano,
  • Camilla Eva Comin,
  • Camilla Eva Comin,
  • Francesca Castiglione,
  • Caterina Bartoli,
  • Luca Voltolini,
  • Luca Voltolini,
  • Serena Pillozzi,
  • Lorenzo Antonuzzo,
  • Lorenzo Antonuzzo,
  • Lorenzo Antonuzzo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.968064
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundKRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS “undruggability”, and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.MethodsWe retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.ResultsIn the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician’s choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.ConclusionsKRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

Keywords