CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (Jun 2024)

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of imatinib and N‐desmethyl imatinib for drug–drug interaction predictions

  • Helena Leonie Hanae Loer,
  • Christina Kovar,
  • Simeon Rüdesheim,
  • Fatima Zahra Marok,
  • Laura Maria Fuhr,
  • Dominik Selzer,
  • Matthias Schwab,
  • Thorsten Lehr

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13127
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 6
pp. 926 – 940

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The first‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has revolutionized the development of targeted cancer therapy and remains among the frontline treatments, for example, against chronic myeloid leukemia. As a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP3A4, and various transporters, imatinib is highly susceptible to drug–drug interactions (DDIs) when co‐administered with corresponding perpetrator drugs. Additionally, imatinib and its main metabolite N‐desmethyl imatinib (NDMI) act as inhibitors of CYP2C8, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 affecting their own metabolism as well as the exposure of co‐medications. This work presents the development of a parent–metabolite whole‐body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for imatinib and NDMI used for the investigation and prediction of different DDI scenarios centered around imatinib as both a victim and perpetrator drug. Model development was performed in PK‐Sim® using a total of 60 plasma concentration–time profiles of imatinib and NDMI in healthy subjects and cancer patients. Metabolism of both compounds was integrated via CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, with imatinib additionally transported via P‐glycoprotein. The subsequently developed DDI network demonstrated good predictive performance. DDIs involving imatinib and NDMI were simulated with perpetrator drugs rifampicin, ketoconazole, and gemfibrozil as well as victim drugs simvastatin and metoprolol. Overall, 12/12 predicted DDI area under the curve determined between first and last plasma concentration measurements (AUClast) ratios and 12/12 predicted DDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) ratios were within twofold of the respective observed ratios. Potential applications of the final model include model‐informed drug development or the support of model‐informed precision dosing.