Tobacco Prevention and Cessation (Mar 2021)

An examination of social and environmental determinants of secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking adolescents

  • Elizabeth K. Do,
  • Kennedy C. Bradley,
  • Kendall Fugate-Laus,
  • Kiranpreet Kaur,
  • Matthew S. Halquist,
  • Laure Ray,
  • Michell A. Pope,
  • Rashelle B. Hayes,
  • David C. Wheeler,
  • Bernard F. Fuemmeler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/131875
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. March
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Adolescents are at increased risk of secondhand smoke exposure (SHS) due to the limited control that they have over social and physical environments. Yet, knowledge regarding determinants of SHS among non-smoking adolescents is limited. This study identifies social and environmental factors associated with SHS among non-smoking adolescents. Methods To be included, parents and adolescents (aged 11–17 years) of the Adolescents, Place, and Behavior Study had to have completed surveys between March 2019 and May 2020. Adolescents had to have not reported smoking within the past 30 days and provided a saliva sample assayed for cotinine (≤3 ng/mL). A series of stepwise linear regression models were fit to the data to identify social and environmental determinants of SHS, using log-transformed salivary cotinine Results Of the 105 adolescent and parent dyads included, 90.3% were African American, 26.9% of parents reported smoking, 33.3% resided in multi-unit housing, and 67.7% lived in homes where smoking was not permitted. Significant associations were found between parent tobacco use (β=2.56, SE=0.98, p=0.0082) and residing in multi-unit housing (β=1.72, SE=0.86, p=0.0460) with increased log-transformed cotinine levels among non-smoking adolescents. Adolescent age, gender, and race/ ethnicity, parental education, peer tobacco use, the number of adults and children in the home, average number of days of self-reported SHS within public spaces outside of the home, and home smoking policies were not significantly associated with cotinine. Conclusions Results emphasize the importance of reducing secondhand smoke exposure by reducing parental smoking and altering exposures within social and home environments. Parental tobacco use and residential setting should be considered when developing interventions to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking adolescents.

Keywords