Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines

Abstract

Microseismic monitoring systems (MMS) have become increasingly crucial in detecting tremors in coal mining. Microseismic sensors (MS), integral components of MMS, profoundly influence positioning accuracy and energy calculations. Hence, calibrating these sensors holds immense importance. To bridge the research gap in MS calibration, this study conducted a systematic investigation. The main conclusions are as follows: based on calibration tests on 102 old MS using the CS18VLF vibration table, it became evident that certain long-used MS in coal mines exhibited significant deviations in frequency and amplitude measurements, indicating sensor failure. Three important calibration indexes, frequency deviation, amplitude deviation, and amplitude linearity are proposed to assess the performance of MS. By comparing the index of old and new MS, critical threshold values were established to evaluate sensor effectiveness. A well-functioning MS exhibits an absolute frequency deviation below 5%, an absolute amplitude deviation within 55%, and amplitude linearity surpassing 0.95. In normal operations, the frequency deviation of MS is significantly smaller than the amplitude deviation. Simplified waveform analysis has unveiled a linear connection between amplitude deviation and localization results. An analysis of the Gutenberg–Richter microseismic energy calculation formula found that the microseismic energy calculation is influenced by both the localization result and amplitude deviation, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact impact of amplitude deviation on microseismic energy. Reliable MS, as well as a robust MS, serve as the fundamental cornerstone for acquiring dependable microseismic data and are essential prerequisites for subsequent microseismic data mining. The insights and findings presented here provide valuable guidance for future MS calibration endeavors and ultimately can guarantee the dependability of microseismic data.

Keywords

• microseismic monitoring system
• microseismic sensor
• amplitude–frequency calibration
• positioning accuracy
• vibration table