eLife (Apr 2019)

Conversion of random X-inactivation to imprinted X-inactivation by maternal PRC2

  • Clair Harris,
  • Marissa Cloutier,
  • Megan Trotter,
  • Michael Hinten,
  • Srimonta Gayen,
  • Zhenhai Du,
  • Wei Xie,
  • Sundeep Kalantry

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44258
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Imprinted X-inactivation silences genes exclusively on the paternally-inherited X-chromosome and is a paradigm of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals. Here, we test the role of maternal vs. zygotic Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) protein EED in orchestrating imprinted X-inactivation in mouse embryos. In maternal-null (Eedm-/-) but not zygotic-null (Eed-/-) early embryos, the maternal X-chromosome ectopically induced Xist and underwent inactivation. Eedm-/- females subsequently stochastically silenced Xist from one of the two X-chromosomes and displayed random X-inactivation. This effect was exacerbated in embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic EED (Eedmz-/-), suggesting that zygotic EED can also contribute to the onset of imprinted X-inactivation. Xist expression dynamics in Eedm-/- embryos resemble that of early human embryos, which lack oocyte-derived maternal PRC2 and only undergo random X-inactivation. Thus, expression of PRC2 in the oocyte and transmission of the gene products to the embryo may dictate the occurrence of imprinted X-inactivation in mammals.

Keywords