Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Sep 2023)

Hypertension evaluated in the public and private Brazilian health system hypertension in public and private service

  • Kecia C. F. O. Amorim,
  • Priscila Valverde O. Vitorino,
  • Audes D. M. Feitosa,
  • Mayara Cedrim Santos,
  • Rodrigo Bezerra,
  • Lais Rocha Lopes,
  • Miguel Camafort,
  • Antonio Coca,
  • Ana Luíza Lima Sousa,
  • Ana Luíza Lima Sousa,
  • Weimar K. S. Barroso,
  • Weimar K. S. Barroso,
  • Weimar K. S. Barroso

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1254933
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionHypertension (HT) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. In Brazil it is estimated that 35% of the adult population has HT and that about 20% of these have blood pressure values within the targets recommended for the reduction of cardiovascular risk. There are some data that point to different control rates in patients treated by cardiologists in public and private referral center and this is an important point to be investigated and discussed.ObjectiveTo compare sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), antihypertensive (AH) drugs, blood pressure (BP) and control rate in public (PURC) and private (PRRC) referral centers.MethodologyA cross-sectional multicenter study that analyzed data from hypertensive patients assisted by the PURC (one in Midwest Region and other in Northeast region) and PRRC (same distribution). Variables analyzed: sex, age, BMI, classes, number of AH used and mean values of systolic and diastolic BP by office measurement and home blood pressure measurement (HBPM). Uncontrolled hypertension (HT) phenotypes and BP control rates were assessed. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests or unpaired t-tests were performed. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered.ResultsA predominantly female (58.9%) sample of 2.956 patients and a higher prevalence of obesity in PURC (p < 0.001) and overweight in PRRC (p < 0.001). The mean AH used was 2.9 ± 1.5 for PURC and 1.4 ± 0.7 for PRRC (p < 0.001). Mean systolic and diastolic BP values were higher in PURC as were rates of uncontrolled HT of 67.8% and 47.6% (p < 0.001) by office measurement and 60.4% and 35.3% (p < 0.001) by HBPM in PURC and PRRC, respectively.ConclusionPatients with HT had a higher prevalence of obesity in the PURC and used almost twice as many AH drugs. BP control rates are worse in the PURC, on average 15.3 mmHg and 12.1 mmHg higher than in the PRRC by office measurement.

Keywords