The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research (May 2024)

Recurrent and novel fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing as part of the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours

  • Rafael Zago Baltazar,
  • Sofie Claerhout,
  • Sara Vander Borght,
  • Lien Spans,
  • Raphael Sciot,
  • Patrick Schöffski,
  • Daphne Hompes,
  • Friedl Sinnaeve,
  • Hazem Wafa,
  • Marleen Renard,
  • Mari FCM van den Hout,
  • Astrid Vernemmen,
  • Louis Libbrecht,
  • An‐Katrien De Roo,
  • Filomena Mazzeo,
  • Cédric van Marcke,
  • Karen Deraedt,
  • Claire Bourgain,
  • Isabelle Vanden Bempt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.12376
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA‐based sequencing (targeted RNA‐seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA‐seq identified a gene fusion, BCOR internal tandem duplication or ALK deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA‐seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA‐seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA‐seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH‐positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement‐positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH‐positive analyses (>41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA‐seq findings. For the EWSR1 FISH probe, we observed a gene‐dependent disparity (p = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA‐seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA‐seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: NAB2::NCOA2, YAP1::NUTM2B, HSPA8::BRAF, and PDE2A::PLAG1. Overall, targeted RNA‐seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.

Keywords