Traditional vs. Modern Data Paths: A Comprehensive Survey

Abstract

Recently, many new network paths have been introduced while old paths are still in use. The trade-offs remain vague and should be further addressed. Since last decade, the Internet is playing a major role in people’s lives, and the demand on the Internet in all fields has increased rapidly. In order to get a fast and secure connection to the Internet, the networks providing the service should get faster and more reliable. Many network data paths have been proposed in order to achieve the previous objectives since the 1970s. It started with the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and later followed by several more modern paths including Quick UDP Internet Connections (QUIC), remote direct memory access (RDMA), and the Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK). This raised the question on which data path should be adopted and based on which features. In this work, we try to answer this question using different perspectives such as the protocol techniques, latency and congestion control, head of line blocking, the achieved throughput, middleboxes consideration, loss recovery mechanisms, developer productivity, host resources utilization and targeted application.

Keywords

• data path
• TCP
• UDP
• QUIC
• RDMA
• DPDK