Frontiers in Medicine (Apr 2022)

Development and Validation of a Two-Step Predictive Risk Stratification Model for Coronavirus Disease 2019 In-hospital Mortality: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Yang Li,
  • Yang Li,
  • Yanlei Kong,
  • Mark H. Ebell,
  • Leonardo Martinez,
  • Xinyan Cai,
  • Robert P. Lennon,
  • Derjung M. Tarn,
  • Arch G. Mainous,
  • Aleksandra E. Zgierska,
  • Bruce Barrett,
  • Wen-Jan Tuan,
  • Kevin Maloy,
  • Munish Goyal,
  • Alex H. Krist,
  • Tamas S. Gal,
  • Meng-Hsuan Sung,
  • Changwei Li,
  • Yier Jin,
  • Ye Shen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.827261
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesAn accurate prognostic score to predict mortality for adults with COVID-19 infection is needed to understand who would benefit most from hospitalizations and more intensive support and care. We aimed to develop and validate a two-step score system for patient triage, and to identify patients at a relatively low level of mortality risk using easy-to-collect individual information.DesignMulticenter retrospective observational cohort study.SettingFour health centers from Virginia Commonwealth University, Georgetown University, the University of Florida, and the University of California, Los Angeles.PatientsCoronavirus Disease 2019-confirmed and hospitalized adult patients.Measurements and Main ResultsWe included 1,673 participants from Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) as the derivation cohort. Risk factors for in-hospital death were identified using a multivariable logistic model with variable selection procedures after repeated missing data imputation. A two-step risk score was developed to identify patients at lower, moderate, and higher mortality risk. The first step selected increasing age, more than one pre-existing comorbidities, heart rate >100 beats/min, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min, and SpO2 <93% into the predictive model. Besides age and SpO2, the second step used blood urea nitrogen, absolute neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, platelet count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors. C-statistics reflected very good discrimination with internal validation at VCU (0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88) and external validation at the other three health systems (range, 0.79–0.85). A one-step model was also derived for comparison. Overall, the two-step risk score had better performance than the one-step score.ConclusionsThe two-step scoring system used widely available, point-of-care data for triage of COVID-19 patients and is a potentially time- and cost-saving tool in practice.

Keywords