Nature and Science of Sleep (Jun 2023)
Longitudinal Findings on the Oneiric Activity Changes Across the Pandemic
Abstract
Serena Scarpelli,1 Valentina Alfonsi,1 Milena Camaioni,1 Maurizio Gorgoni,1,2 Antonio Albano,3 Alessandro Musetti,4 Maria Catena Quattropani,5,6 Giuseppe Plazzi,7,8 Luigi De Gennaro,1,2 Christian Franceschini3 1Department of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy; 2Body and Action Lab, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy; 3Department of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 4Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 5Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 6Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 7Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 8IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, ItalyCorrespondence: Serena Scarpelli, Department of Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Via dei Marsi 78, Rome, 00185, Italy, Tel +39 06 49917508, Email [email protected]: COVID-19 pandemic waves have strongly influenced individuals’ behaviors and mental health. Here, we analyzed longitudinal data collected in the Spring 2020 and 2021 from a large Italian sample with the aim of assessing changes in dream features between the first and third wave. Specifically, we evaluated the modifications of pandemic dream activity as a function of the general distress variations over time. Also, we detected the best explanatory variables of nightmare frequency and distress.Materials and Methods: Participants previously involved in the web survey during the first wave of the pandemic were asked to complete a new online survey on sleep and dream features available in Spring 2021 (N=728). Subjects decreasing their level of psychological general distress in the third (T3) vs the first (T1) pandemic wave were defined as “Improved” (N=330). In contrast, participants with an unchanged or increased level of general distress were defined as “Not Improved” (N=398).Results: Statistical comparisons revealed that dream recall frequency, nightmare frequency, lucid dream frequency, and emotional intensity show a reduction in T3 than T1. Moreover, the Improved group is characterized by lower nightmare rate and nightmare distress than Not Improved people. Our findings confirmed that beyond the trait-like variables (ie, age, sex), specific sleep-related measures are related to nightmare features. In particular, poor sleep hygiene was one of the best determinants of nightmare distress among Not Improved subjects.Conclusion: Our findings revealed that people experienced an adaptation to the pandemic during the third wave. We also strengthen the notion that nightmares and their variations over time are strongly related to human well-being, suggesting that specific trait-like and sleep-related factors could modulate the relationship between mental health and nightmare features.Keywords: nightmare, distress, sleep, pandemic, third wave, clinical psychology
