Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Nov 2021)

Layer-Specific Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Arrhythmic Risk in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

  • Diego Segura-Rodríguez,
  • Diego Segura-Rodríguez,
  • Francisco José Bermúdez-Jiménez,
  • Francisco José Bermúdez-Jiménez,
  • Francisco José Bermúdez-Jiménez,
  • Lorena González-Camacho,
  • Eduardo Moreno Escobar,
  • Eduardo Moreno Escobar,
  • Rocío García-Orta,
  • Rocío García-Orta,
  • Juan Emilio Alcalá-López,
  • Juan Emilio Alcalá-López,
  • Alicia Bautista Pavés,
  • Alicia Bautista Pavés,
  • José Manuel Oyonarte-Ramírez,
  • José Manuel Oyonarte-Ramírez,
  • Silvia López-Fernández,
  • Silvia López-Fernández,
  • Miguel Álvarez,
  • Miguel Álvarez,
  • Luis Tercedor,
  • Luis Tercedor,
  • Juan Jiménez-Jáimez,
  • Juan Jiménez-Jáimez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.748003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Background: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a life-threatening disease which predispose to malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the early stages of the disease. Risk stratification relies on the electrical, genetic, and imaging data. Our study aimed to investigate how myocardial deformation parameters may identify the subjects at risk of known predictors of major ventricular arrhythmias.Methods: A cohort of 45 subjects with definite or borderline diagnosis of AC was characterized using the advanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and divided into the groups according to the potential arrhythmic risk markers, such as non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and genetic status. Layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) by TTE 2D speckle tracking was compared in patients with and without these arrhythmic risk markers.Results: In this study, 23 (51.1%) patients were men with mean age of 43 ± 16 years. Next-generation sequencing identified a potential pathogenic mutation in 39 (86.7%) patients. Thirty-nine patients presented LGE (73.3%), mostly located at the subepicardial-to-mesocardial layers. A layer-specific-GLS analysis showed worse GLS values at the epicardial and mesocardial layers in the subjects with NSVT and LGE. The epicardial GLS values of −15.4 and −16.1% were the best cut-off values for identifying the individuals with NSVT and LGE, respectively, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).Conclusions: The layer-specific GLS assessment identified the subjects with high-risk arrhythmic features in AC, such as NSVT and LGE. An epicardial GLS may emerge as a potential instrument for detecting the subjects at risk of SCD in AC.

Keywords