Journal of Eating Disorders (Jan 2024)

Do risk factors differentiate DSM-5 and drive for thinness severity groups for anorexia nervosa?

  • An Binh Dang,
  • Litza Kiropoulos,
  • Marija Anderluh,
  • David Collier,
  • Fernando Fernandez-Aranda,
  • Andreas Karwautz,
  • Janet Treasure,
  • Gudrun Wagner,
  • Isabel Krug

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-00966-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The current study examined whether risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN) were related to different levels of severity based on (a) the DSM-5/body mass index (BMI) and (b) drive for thinness (DT) severity ratings. Methods The sample comprised 153 pairs of individuals with a lifetime diagnosis AN per DSM-IV criteria and their non-ED sisters (N = 306, mean age = 26.53; mean current BMI = 20.42 kg/m2). The Oxford risk factor interview was used to establish AN-related risk factors. Individuals were categorised into the DSM-5 severity groups based on their lowest BMI, while the DT subscale from the eating disorder inventory-2 was used to classify individuals with AN into low and high DT groups. Results Multinominal regression models showed similar risk factors (e.g., perfectionism, having a history of being teased about weight and shape) contributed to the development of AN using the DSM-5 and DT severity ratings. Follow-up analyses across the severity groups for both indices revealed that only childhood perfectionism was found to be more common in the extreme severe DSM-5 BMI severity group compared to the severe DSM-5 group. Conclusion Overall, this study found little evidence for AN risk factors being related to the DSM-5 and DT severity ratings. However, given the novelty of this study, replication of the current results is warranted.

Keywords