Frontiers in Psychology (Aug 2022)

The Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB): standardization and preliminary clinical usability evidence

  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,
  • Alice Naomi Preti,
  • Veronica Pucci,
  • Veronica Pucci,
  • Lorenzo Diana,
  • Alessia Corvaglia,
  • Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro,
  • Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro,
  • Teresa Difonzo,
  • Stefano Zago,
  • Ildebrando Appollonio,
  • Sara Mondini,
  • Sara Mondini,
  • Nadia Bolognini,
  • Nadia Bolognini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963164
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThis study aimed at standardizing and providing preliminary evidence on the clinical usability of the Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB), which includes phonemic (t-PVF), semantic (t-SVF) and alternate (t-AVF) verbal fluency tasks.MethodsThree-hundred and thirty-five Italian healthy participants (HPs; 140 males; age range = 18–96 years; education range = 4–23 years) and 27 individuals with neurodegenerative or cerebrovascular diseases were administered the t-VFB. Switch number and cluster size were computed via latent semantic analyses. HPs underwent the telephone-based Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Backward Digit Span (BDS). Construct validity, factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability and equivalence with the in-person Verbal Fluency tasks were assessed. Norms were derived via Equivalent Scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical populations was assessed.ResultsThe majority of t-VFB scores correlated among each other and with the BDS, but not with the MMSE. Switch number correlated with t-PVF, t-SVF, t-AVF scores, whilst cluster size with the t-SVF and t-AVF scores only. The t-VFB was underpinned by a mono-component structure and was internally consistent (Cronbach’s α = 0.91). Test-retest (ICC = 0.69–0.95) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98–1) were optimal. Each t-VFB test was statistically equivalent to its in-person version (equivalence bounds yielding a p < 0.05). Education predicted all t-VFB scores, whereas age t-SVF and t-AVF scores and sex only some t-SVF scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical samples was optimal (AUC = 0.81–0.86).DiscussionThe t-VFB is a valid, reliable and normed telephone-based assessment tool for language and executive functioning, equivalent to the in-person version; results show promising evidence of its diagnostic accuracy in neurological populations.

Keywords