Journal of Clinical Medicine (Dec 2021)

Date of Admission during COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Patient Outcomes in Addition to the Higher Efficacy of Tocilizumab Plus High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy Compared to Tocilizumab Alone

  • Moncef Belhassen-García,
  • Antonio Sánchez-Puente,
  • Pedro-Ignacio Dorado-Díaz,
  • Amparo López-Bernús,
  • Jesús Sampedro-Gómez,
  • Raúl Azibeiro-Melchor,
  • Edgard Marcano-Millán,
  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Alonso,
  • María-Elisa Sánchez-Barrado,
  • Ignacio Hernández-García,
  • Ignacio Madruga,
  • Guillermo Hernández-Pérez,
  • Cristina Carbonell,
  • Judit García-Aparicio,
  • Laura Burgos,
  • Eugenia López-Sánchez,
  • Carlos Reina,
  • Ana-María Ramón,
  • Laura Cestero-Ramírez,
  • Fátima Boumhir,
  • Daniel Encinas-Sánchez,
  • María Sánchez-Ledesma,
  • Jacinto Herráez,
  • Patricia Araoz,
  • María-José Sánchez-Crespo,
  • Sandra Rodríguez-Rodríguez,
  • Ana-Elisa Rodríguez-Gude,
  • Miguel-Vicente Sánchez-Hernández,
  • Rafael Borrás,
  • Víctor Sagredo-Meneses,
  • Pedro-Luis Sánchez,
  • Miguel Marcos,
  • José-Ángel Martín-Oterino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010198
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
p. 198

Abstract

Read online

Background: The evidence for the efficacy of glucocorticoids combined with tocilizumab (TCZ) in COVID-19 comes from observational studies or subgroup analysis. Our aim was to compare outcomes between hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received high-dose corticosteroid pulse therapy and TCZ and those who received TCZ. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was performed on consecutive hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 between 1 March and 23 April 2020. Patients treated with either TCZ (400–600 mg, one to two doses) and methylprednisolone pulses (MPD-TCZ group) or TCZ alone were analyzed for the occurrence of a combined endpoint of death and need for invasive mechanical ventilation during admission. The independence of both treatment groups was tested using machine learning classifiers, and relevant variables that were potentially different between the groups were measured through a mean decrease accuracy algorithm. Results: An earlier date of admission was significantly associated with worse outcomes regardless of treatment type. Twenty patients died (27.0%) in the TCZ group, and 33 (44.6%) died or required intubation (n = 74), whereas in the MPD-TCZ group, 15 (11.0%) patients died and 29 (21.3%) patients reached the combined endpoint (n = 136; p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Machine learning methodology using a random forest classifier confirmed significant differences between the treatment groups. Conclusions: MPD and TCZ improved outcomes (death and invasive mechanical ventilation) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but confounding variables such as the date of admission during the COVID-19 pandemic should be considered in observational studies.

Keywords