JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques (Aug 2022)

Outcomes and complications after different surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis

  • John D. Synovec, MD, MBA,
  • Sophia A. Traven, MD,
  • Adam T. Griffith, MD,
  • David Novikov, MD,
  • Xinning Li, MD,
  • Shane K. Woolf, MD,
  • Josef K. Eichinger, MD,
  • Harris S. Slone, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 3
pp. 323 – 331

Abstract

Read online

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature evaluating surgical outcomes after chronic distal biceps tendon rupture. Surgical techniques, including primary repair, autograft reconstruction, and allograft reconstruction, were compared, as well as subjective and objective clinical outcomes and complication rates. Methods: A systematic literature search of Level I-IV studies reporting outcomes of surgically treated chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures were performed via PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Twenty-two papers were identified in the review, with 236 patients. A Modified Coleman Methodological Score (CMS) was determined for every article to assess study quality. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative range of motion, flexion and supination strength, and postoperative complications were recorded. MAYO elbow scores (MEPS) were reported more consistently than the other outcome tools. Results: No Level I or level II studies were identified in our search, and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. Studies demonstrated mean MEPS scores ranging between 86 and 100, regardless of the surgical technique utilized. All studies reported a mean flexion-extension arc equal to or greater than 5-130°. The reported mean postoperative flexion strength was within 10% of the unaffected contralateral side. The most common complication for both direct repair and reconstruction groups was paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve [direct repair: 18–16.8%; reconstruction: 8–6.2% (allograft: 4–6%; autograft: 4–7%)]. Rerupture was uncommon and occurred in three patients who had undergone direct repair and in one patient after autograft reconstruction. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of chronic distal biceps injuries yields favorable objective and subjective outcomes. Currently, available evidence suggests that direct repair, autograft reconstruction, or allograft reconstruction are all viable treatment options with similar outcomes.

Keywords