Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework (AHP-TOPSIS): Pavement Preventive Maintenance Case Study for Ordinary National Trunk Highways

Abstract

Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making needs to weigh multiple strategic goals to achieve sustainable development through the pavement maintenance management system. Making decisions regarding pavement preventive maintenance is both intricate and costly. This study introduces a multi-criteria decision-making framework aimed at enhancing the scientific basis of such decisions. The framework first establishes an evaluation system for preventive maintenance strategies by considering three primary evaluation criteria—service functionality, pavement performance, and economic benefits, and then identifies nine specific evaluation indicators to influence these criteria, with a comparison matrix constructed to determine the weight of each indicator in relation to the maintenance decision hierarchy. Following this, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is employed to prioritize four commonly utilized preventive maintenance strategies. The results reveal that pavement condition and maintenance costs are the most influential factors in determining the appropriate preventive maintenance strategies for national highways. The priority rankings for the four strategies—slurry seal, micro-surfacing, chip seal, and ultra-thin overlays—are found to be 56.12%, 63.86%, 12.12%, and 83.52%, respectively, with ultra-thin overlays identified as the optimal choice for second-class highways. The decision-making model utilized in this study enables a multi-dimensional analysis, reducing the subjectivity inherent in expert evaluations and facilitating the prompt identification of the most suitable maintenance strategy.

Keywords

• preventive maintenance strategy
• maintenance scheme
• analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
• technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)
• destruction of the highway
• highway service life