Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (Feb 2024)
Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of vigabatrin enantiomers in rats
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of VGB racemate and its single enantiomers, and explore the potential of clinic development for single enantiomer S-VGB. Methods: In the pharmacokinetics study, male Sprague-Dawley rats were gavaged with VGB racemate or its single enantiomers dosing 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg, and the blood samples were collected during 12 h at regular intervals. In the experiment of tissue distribution, VGB and its single enantiomers were administered intravenously dosing 200 mg/kg, and the tissues including heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney, eyes, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex were separated at different times. The concentrations of R-VGB and S-VGB in the plasma and tissues were measured using HPLC. Results: Both S-VGB and R-VGB could be detected in the plasma of rats administered with VGB racemate, reaching Cmax at approximately 0.5 h with t1/2 2–3 h. There was no significant pharmacokinetic difference between the two enantiomers when VGB racemate was given 200 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg. However, when given at the dose of 50 mg/kg, S-VGB presented a shorter t1/2 and a higher Cl/F than R-VGB, indicating a faster metabolism of S-VGB. Furthermore, when single enantiomer was administered respectively, S-VGB presented a slower metabolism than R-VGB, as indicated by a longer t1/2 and MRT but a lower Cmax. Moreover, compared with the VGB racemate, the single enantiomers S-VGB and R-VGB had shorter t1/2 and MRT, higher Cmax and AUC/D, and lower Vz/F and Cl/F, indicating the stronger oral absorption and faster metabolism of single enantiomer. In addition, regardless of VGB racemate administration or single enantiomer administration, S-VGB and R-VGB had similar characteristics in tissue distribution, and the content of S-VGB in hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and liver was much higher than that of R-VGB. Conclusions: Although there is no transformation between S-VGB and R-VGB in vivo, those two enantiomers display certain disparities in the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution, and interact with each other. These findings might be a possible interpretation for the pharmacological and toxic effects of VGB and a potential direction for the development and optimization of the single enantiomer S-VGB.
