JMIR Medical Informatics (Jan 2025)

Effectiveness of the Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) in Two Public Health Center Jurisdictions in Japan: Prospective Observational Study

  • Junko Kurita,
  • Motomi Hori,
  • Sumiyo Yamaguchi,
  • Aiko Ogiwara,
  • Yurina Saito,
  • Minako Sugiyama,
  • Asami Sunadori,
  • Tomoko Hayashi,
  • Akane Hara,
  • Yukari Kawana,
  • Youichi Itoi,
  • Tamie Sugawara,
  • Yoshiyuki Sugishita,
  • Fujiko Irie,
  • Naomi Sakurai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/58509
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13
pp. e58509 – e58509

Abstract

Read online

Abstract BackgroundResidents of facilities for older people are vulnerable to COVID-19 outbreaks. Nevertheless, timely recognition of outbreaks at facilities for older people at public health centers has been impossible in Japan since May 8, 2023, when the Japanese government discontinued aggressive countermeasures against COVID-19 because of the waning severity of the dominant Omicron strain. The Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) has been developed to improve information collection. ObjectiveThis study examined FESSy experiences and effectiveness in two public health center jurisdictions in Japan. MethodsThis study assessed the use by public health centers of the detection mode of an automated AI detection system (ie, FESSy AI), as well as manual detection by the public health centers’ staff (ie, FESSy staff) and direct reporting by facilities to the public health centers. We considered the following aspects: (1) diagnoses or symptoms, (2) numbers of patients as of their detection date, and (3) ultimate numbers of patients involved in incidents. Subsequently, effectiveness was assessed and compared based on detection modes. The study lasted from June 1, 2023, through January 2024. ResultsIn both areas, this study examined 31 facilities at which 87 incidents were detected. FESSy (AI or staff) detected significantly fewer patients than non-FESSy methods, that is, direct reporting to the public health center of the detection date and ultimate number of patients. ConclusionsFESSy was superior to direct reporting from facilities for the number of patients as of the detection date and for the ultimate outbreak size.