Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Jan 2009)

Validation of version-4.61 methane and nitrous oxide observed by MIPAS

  • S. Payan,
  • C. Camy-Peyret,
  • H. Oelhaf,
  • G. Wetzel,
  • G. Maucher,
  • C. Keim,
  • M. Pirre,
  • N. Huret,
  • A. Engel,
  • M. C. Volk,
  • H. Kuellmann,
  • J. Kuttippurath,
  • U. Cortesi,
  • G. Bianchini,
  • F. Mencaraglia,
  • P. Raspollini,
  • G. Redaelli,
  • C. Vigouroux,
  • M. De Mazière,
  • S. Mikuteit,
  • T. Blumenstock,
  • V. Velazco,
  • J. Notholt,
  • E. Mahieu,
  • P. Duchatelet,
  • D. Smale,
  • S. Wood,
  • N. Jones,
  • C. Piccolo,
  • V. Payne,
  • A. Bracher,
  • N. Glatthor,
  • G. Stiller,
  • K. Grunow,
  • P. Jeseck,
  • Y. Te,
  • A. Butz

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 2
pp. 413 – 442

Abstract

Read online

The ENVISAT validation programme for the atmospheric instruments MIPAS, SCIAMACHY and GOMOS is based on a number of balloon-borne, aircraft, satellite and ground-based correlative measurements. In particular the activities of validation scientists were coordinated by ESA within the ENVISAT Stratospheric Aircraft and Balloon Campaign or ESABC. As part of a series of similar papers on other species [this issue] and in parallel to the contribution of the individual validation teams, the present paper provides a synthesis of comparisons performed between MIPAS CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O profiles produced by the current ESA operational software (Instrument Processing Facility version 4.61 or IPF v4.61, full resolution MIPAS data covering the period 9 July 2002 to 26 March 2004) and correlative measurements obtained from balloon and aircraft experiments as well as from satellite sensors or from ground-based instruments. In the middle stratosphere, no significant bias is observed between MIPAS and correlative measurements, and MIPAS is providing a very consistent and global picture of the distribution of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O in this region. In average, the MIPAS CH<sub>4</sub> values show a small positive bias in the lower stratosphere of about 5%. A similar situation is observed for N<sub>2</sub>O with a positive bias of 4%. In the lower stratosphere/upper troposphere (UT/LS) the individual used MIPAS data version 4.61 still exhibits some unphysical oscillations in individual CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O profiles caused by the processing algorithm (with almost no regularization). Taking these problems into account, the MIPAS CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O profiles are behaving as expected from the internal error estimation of IPF v4.61 and the estimated errors of the correlative measurements.