An electronic consultation program impacts on heart failure patients' prognosis: implications for heart failure care

Abstract

Abstract Aims e‐consults are asynchronous, clinician‐to‐clinician exchanges that answer focused, non‐urgent, patient‐specific questions using the electronic medical record. We instituted an e‐consultation programme (2013–2019) for all general practitioners (GPs) referrals to cardiologists that preceded patients' in‐person consultations when considered. In our study, we aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics, 1 year prognosis and the prognostic determinants of patients with a previous diagnosis of HF referred for an e‐consult, categorized by their previous HF‐related hospitalization status (recent hospitalization, 1 year before or never been hospitalized because of HF), and to analyse the impact of reducing the time elapsed between e‐consultation and response by the cardiologist in terms of prognosis. Methods and results Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from 4851 HF patients referred by GPs to the cardiology department for an e‐consultation 2013 and 2020. The delay of time to e‐consults were solved was 8.6 + 8.6 days with 84.3% solved in <14 days. For the 1 year prognosis evaluation after the e‐consult were assessed the cardiovascular hospitalizations, HF‐related hospitalizations, HF‐related mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all‐cause mortality. Compared with the group without a previous hospitalization, patients with recent and remote HF hospitalization were at higher risk of a new HF‐related hospitalization (OR: 19.41 [95% CI: 12.95–29.11]; OR: 8.44 [95% CI: 5.14–13.87], respectively), HF‐related mortality (OR: 2.47 [95% CI: 1.43–4.27]; OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 0.51–3.06], respectively), as well as cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality and all‐cause mortality. Reduction in the time elapsed because e‐consultation was solved was associated with lower risk of HF‐related mortality (OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.89–0.99]), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.93–0.98]), and all‐cause mortality (OR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97–1.00]). Conclusions A clinician‐to‐clinician e‐consultation programme between GPs and cardiologists in patients with HF allows to solve the demand of care in around 25% e‐consults without an in‐person consultation; the patients with a previous history of HF‐related hospitalization showed a worse 1 year outcome. A reduction in the time elapsed because e‐consultation was solved was associated with a mortality reduction.

Keywords

• Heart failure
• Electronic consultation
• Healthcare management
• Cardiovascular outcomes