Investigating survival, quality of life and cognition in PROton versus photon therapy for IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas (PRO-GLIO): a randomised controlled trial in Norway and Sweden
Inge C Olsen,
Thomas Henry,
Corina Silvia Rueegg,
Asgeir S Jakola,
Hanne Blakstad,
Petter Brandal,
Liv Cathrine Heggebø,
Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen,
Hillevi Rylander,
Cecilie Kiserud,
Tonje Haug Nordenmark,
Taran Paulsen Hellebust,
Morten Egeberg Evensen,
Magnus Gustavsson,
Christina Ramberg,
Mette Sprauten,
Henriette Magelssen,
Janani Moorthy,
Karin Andersson,
Ingela Raunert,
Cecilie Moe,
Carin Granlund,
Dorota Goplen,
Jorunn Brekke,
Tor-Christian Aase Johannessen,
Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim,
Kirsten Marienhagen,
Øyvind Humberset,
Per Bergström,
Måns Agrup,
Ludvig Dahl,
Michael Gubanski,
Helene Gojon,
Carl-Johan Brahme,
Isabelle Rydén,
Einar O Vik-Mo,
Hanne C. Lie,
Lars Asphaug,
Maziar Hervani,
Ingrid Kristensen,
Rolf J Ledal,
Eskil Degsell,
Katja Werlenius,
Malin Blomstrand
Affiliations
Inge C Olsen
Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Thomas Henry
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Corina Silvia Rueegg
Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Asgeir S Jakola
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
Hanne Blakstad
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Petter Brandal
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Liv Cathrine Heggebø
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Hillevi Rylander
Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
Cecilie Kiserud
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Tonje Haug Nordenmark
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Taran Paulsen Hellebust
Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Morten Egeberg Evensen
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Magnus Gustavsson
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Christina Ramberg
Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Mette Sprauten
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Henriette Magelssen
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Janani Moorthy
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Karin Andersson
Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
Ingela Raunert
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Cecilie Moe
Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Carin Granlund
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Dorota Goplen
Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Jorunn Brekke
Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Tor-Christian Aase Johannessen
Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Kirsten Marienhagen
Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
Øyvind Humberset
Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
Per Bergström
Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
Måns Agrup
Department of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
Ludvig Dahl
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Michael Gubanski
Department of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Helene Gojon
Department of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Carl-Johan Brahme
Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
Isabelle Rydén
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
Einar O Vik-Mo
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Hanne C. Lie
Department of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Lars Asphaug
Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Maziar Hervani
Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Ingrid Kristensen
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Rolf J Ledal
Norwegian Brain Tumor Alliance, Oslo, Norway
Eskil Degsell
Swedish Brain Tumor Association, Stockholm, Sweden
Katja Werlenius
Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Malin Blomstrand
Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Introduction The use of proton therapy increases globally despite a lack of randomised controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Proton therapy enables sparing of non-neoplastic tissue from radiation. This is principally beneficial and holds promise of reduced long-term side effects. However, the sparing of seemingly non-cancerous tissue is not necessarily positive for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3, which have a diffuse growth pattern. With their relatively good prognosis, yet incurable nature, therapy needs to be delicately balanced to achieve a maximal survival benefit combined with an optimised quality of life.Methods and analysis PRO-GLIO (PROton versus photon therapy in IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase III non-inferiority study. 224 patients aged 18–65 years with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3 from Norway and Sweden will be randomised 1:1 to radiotherapy delivered with protons (experimental arm) or photons (standard arm). First intervention-free survival at 2 years is the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints are fatigue and cognitive impairment, both at 2 years. Additional secondary outcomes include several survival measures, health-related quality of life parameters and health economy endpoints.Ethics and dissemination To implement proton therapy as part of standard of care for patients with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3, it should be deemed safe. With its randomised controlled design testing proton versus photon therapy, PRO-GLIO will provide important information for this patient population concerning safety, cognition, fatigue and other quality of life parameters. As proton therapy is considerably more costly than its photon counterpart, cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. PRO-GLIO is approved by ethical committees in Norway (Regional Committee for Medical & Health Research Ethics) and Sweden (The Swedish Ethical Review Authority) and patient inclusion has commenced. Trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, relevant conferences, national and international meetings and expert forums.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05190172).