Assessing Different Fruit Formulations for the Supplementation of Bakery Products with Bioactive Micro-Constituents from Sweet Cherry (<i>Prunus avium</i> L.) and Sour Cherry (<i>Prunus cerasus</i> L.): A Physicochemical and Rheological Approach

Abstract

Sour and sweet cherries were evaluated as functional components in bread-making because of their bioactive microconstituent content. Five forms of enrichment for each fruit, including the hydroalcoholic extract, lyophilized pulverized fruit, lyophilized extract, and their combinations, were used for supplementation. The physicochemical (pH, color, moisture, rheology, and texture) and sensory properties of dough and bread were assessed in different environments (biological and chemical leavening). Sour cherry in pulverized and extract forms showed higher phenolic content than sweet cherry, especially in the pulverized form. The viscoelasticity of the doughs varied based on the proofing environment and the fortification form. Chemically leavened doughs exhibited higher moduli (G′, G″), complex viscosity (η*), and hardness. Biologically leavened doughs had a lower pH, influencing color, and swelling percentage, which is linked to the enrichment form and phenolic content. Extract-fortified doughs displayed increased G′, η*, and hardness compared to the control, whereas yeast-leavened doughs showed reduced swelling ability. Physicochemical changes were more significant in the yeast-leavened systems, which also scored higher on the sensory evaluations. Supplementing bakery products with bioactive fruit components enhances antioxidant status, but the enrichment form and proofing conditions significantly affect the physicochemical and sensory properties of the product.

Keywords

• enrichment
• bakery products
• fruit extract
• sour cherry
• cherry