Frontiers in Neurology (Aug 2022)

aEYE: A deep learning system for video nystagmus detection

  • Narayani Wagle,
  • Narayani Wagle,
  • John Morkos,
  • Jingyan Liu,
  • Henry Reith,
  • Joseph Greenstein,
  • Kirby Gong,
  • Indranuj Gangan,
  • Daniil Pakhomov,
  • Sanchit Hira,
  • Oleg V. Komogortsev,
  • David E. Newman-Toker,
  • David E. Newman-Toker,
  • David E. Newman-Toker,
  • Raimond Winslow,
  • Raimond Winslow,
  • Raimond Winslow,
  • David S. Zee,
  • David S. Zee,
  • David S. Zee,
  • Jorge Otero-Millan,
  • Jorge Otero-Millan,
  • Kemar E. Green,
  • Kemar E. Green

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.963968
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundNystagmus identification and interpretation is challenging for non-experts who lack specific training in neuro-ophthalmology or neuro-otology. This challenge is magnified when the task is performed via telemedicine. Deep learning models have not been heavily studied in video-based eye movement detection.MethodsWe developed, trained, and validated a deep-learning system (aEYE) to classify video recordings as normal or bearing at least two consecutive beats of nystagmus. The videos were retrospectively collected from a subset of the monocular (right eye) video-oculography (VOG) recording used in the Acute Video-oculography for Vertigo in Emergency Rooms for Rapid Triage (AVERT) clinical trial (#NCT02483429). Our model was derived from a preliminary dataset representing about 10% of the total AVERT videos (n = 435). The videos were trimmed into 10-sec clips sampled at 60 Hz with a resolution of 240 × 320 pixels. We then created 8 variations of the videos by altering the sampling rates (i.e., 30 Hz and 15 Hz) and image resolution (i.e., 60 × 80 pixels and 15 × 20 pixels). The dataset was labeled as “nystagmus” or “no nystagmus” by one expert provider. We then used a filtered image-based motion classification approach to develop aEYE. The model's performance at detecting nystagmus was calculated by using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.ResultsAn ensemble between the ResNet-soft voting and the VGG-hard voting models had the best performing metrics. The AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.86, 88.4, 74.2, and 82.7%, respectively. Our validated folds had an average AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.86, 80.3, 80.9, and 80.4%, respectively. Models created from the compressed videos decreased in accuracy as image sampling rate decreased from 60 Hz to 15 Hz. There was only minimal change in the accuracy of nystagmus detection when decreasing image resolution and keeping sampling rate constant.ConclusionDeep learning is useful in detecting nystagmus in 60 Hz video recordings as well as videos with lower image resolutions and sampling rates, making it a potentially useful tool to aid future automated eye-movement enabled neurologic diagnosis.

Keywords