Health Science Reports (Oct 2023)

Development of a population‐level prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality in older adults: A population‐based cohort study

  • Sikandar H. Khan,
  • Anthony J. Perkins,
  • Mikita Fuchita,
  • Emma Holler,
  • Damaris Ortiz,
  • Malaz Boustani,
  • Babar A. Khan,
  • Sujuan Gao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1634
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 10
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and Aims Given the growing utilization of critical care services by an aging population, development of population‐level risk models which predict intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality may offer advantages for researchers and health systems. Our objective was to develop a risk model for ICU survivorship and mortality among community dwelling older adults. Methods This was a population‐based cohort study of 48,127 patients who were 50 years and older with at least one primary care visit between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify variables predictive of ICU survivorship. Results ICU admission and mortality within 2 years after index primary care visit date were used to divide patients into three groups of “alive without ICU admission”, “ICU survivors,” and “death.” Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify EHR predictive variables for the three patient outcomes. Cross‐validation by randomly splitting the data into derivation and validation data sets (60:40 split) was used to identify predictor variables and validate model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) curve. In our overall sample, 92.2% of patients were alive without ICU admission, 6.2% were admitted to the ICU at least once and survived, and 1.6% died. Greater deciles of age over 50 years, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder or chronic heart failure, and laboratory abnormalities in alkaline phosphatase, hematocrit, and albumin contributed highest risk score weights for mortality. Risk scores derived from the model discriminated between patients that died versus remained alive without ICU admission (AUC = 0.858), and between ICU survivors versus alive without ICU admission (AUC = 0.765). Conclusion Our risk scores provide a feasible and scalable tool for researchers and health systems to identify patient cohorts at increased risk for ICU admission and survivorship. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate the risk scores in other patient populations.

Keywords