Heliyon (Mar 2024)

Comparison of RT-PCR and antigen test sensitivity across nasopharyngeal, nares, and oropharyngeal swab, and saliva sample types during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant

  • Gregory L. Damhorst,
  • Jessica Lin,
  • Jennifer K. Frediani,
  • Julie A. Sullivan,
  • Adrianna Westbrook,
  • Kaleb McLendon,
  • Tyler J. Baugh,
  • William H. O'Sick,
  • John D. Roback,
  • Anne L. Piantadosi,
  • Jesse J. Waggoner,
  • Leda Bassit,
  • Anuradha Rao,
  • Morgan Greenleaf,
  • Jared W. O'Neal,
  • Seegar Swanson,
  • Nira R. Pollock,
  • Greg S. Martin,
  • Wilbur A. Lam,
  • Joshua M. Levy

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 6
p. e27188

Abstract

Read online

Limited data highlight the need to understand differences in SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant viral load between the gold standard nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, mid-turbinate (MT)/anterior nasal swabs, oropharyngeal (OP) swabs, and saliva. MT, OP, and saliva samples from symptomatic individuals in Atlanta, GA, in January 2022 and longitudinal samples from a small familial cohort were tested by both RT-PCR and ultrasensitive antigen assays. Higher concentrations in the nares were observed in the familial cohort, but a dominant sample type was not found among 39 cases in the cross-sectional cohort. The composite of positive MT or OP assay for both RT-PCR and antigen assay trended toward higher diagnostic yield but did not achieve significant difference. Our data did not identify a singular preferred sample type for SARS-CoV-2 testing, but higher levels of saliva nucleocapsid, a trend toward higher yield of composite OP/MT result, and association of apparent MT or OP predominance with symptoms warrant further study.

Keywords