Haematologica (Feb 2023)

Integrated genetic and clinical prognostic factors for aggressive adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma

  • Takuro Kameda,
  • Keisuke Kataoka,
  • Ayako Kamiunten,
  • Michihiro Hidaka,
  • Hiroaki Miyoshi,
  • Nobuaki Nakano,
  • Kisato Nosaka,
  • Makoto Yoshimitsu,
  • Jun-ichirou Yasunaga,
  • Yasunori Kogure,
  • Kotaro Shide,
  • Masaharu Miyahara,
  • Takashi Sakamoto,
  • Keiichi Akizuki,
  • Tomonori Hidaka,
  • Yoko Kubuki,
  • Junji Koya,
  • Noriaki Kawano,
  • Kiyoshi Yamashita,
  • Hiroshi Kawano,
  • Takanori Toyama,
  • Kouichi Maeda,
  • Kosuke Marutsuka,
  • Yoshitaka Imaizumi,
  • Koji Kato,
  • Takeshi Sugio,
  • Masahito Tokunaga,
  • Yukie Tashiro,
  • Akifumi Takaori-Kondo,
  • Yasushi Miyazaki,
  • Koichi Akashi,
  • Kenji Ishitsuka,
  • Masao Matsuoka,
  • Koichi Ohshima,
  • Toshiki Watanabe,
  • Akira Kitanaka,
  • Atae Utsunomiya,
  • Seishi Ogawa,
  • Kazuya Shimoda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.281510
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 108, no. 8

Abstract

Read online

The prognosis of aggressive adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is poor, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment. In order to identify favorable prognostic patients after intensive chemotherapy, and who therefore might not require upfront allo-HSCT, we aimed to improve risk stratification of aggressive ATL patients aged <70 years. The clinical risk factors and genetic mutations were incorporated into risk modeling for overall survival (OS). We generated the m7-ATLPI, a clinicogenetic risk model for OS, that included the ATL prognostic index (PI) (ATL-PI) risk category, and non-silent mutations in seven genes, namely TP53, IRF4, RHOA, PRKCB, CARD11, CCR7, and GATA3. In the training cohort of 99 patients, the m7-ATLPI identified a low-, intermediate-, and highrisk group with 2-year OS of 100%, 43%, and 19%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] =5.46; P<0.0001). The m7-ATLPI achieved superior risk stratification compared to the current ATL-PI (C-index 0.92 vs. 0.85, respectively). In the validation cohort of 84 patients, the m7-ATLPI defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with a 2-year OS of 81%, 30%, and 0%, respectively (HR=2.33; P=0.0094), and the model again outperformed the ATL-PI (C-index 0.72 vs. 0.70, respectively). The simplified m7-ATLPI, which is easier to use in clinical practice, achieved superior risk stratification compared to the ATLPI, as did the original m7-ATLPI; the simplified version was calculated by summing the following: high-risk ATL-PI category (+10), low-risk ATL-PI category (−4), and non-silent mutations in TP53 (+4), IRF4 (+3), RHOA (+1), PRKCB (+1), CARD11 (+0.5), CCR7 (−2), and GATA3 (−3).