PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Relationship between mentalizing and teacher burnout: A cross sectional study.

  • Teodora Safiye,
  • Branimir Vukčević,
  • Ardea Milidrag,
  • Jakša Dubljanin,
  • Azra Gutić Cikotić,
  • Draško Dubljanin,
  • Maja Lačković,
  • Ivana Rodić,
  • Milica Nikolić,
  • Goran Čolaković,
  • Tatjana Mladenović,
  • Medo Gutić

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279535
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
p. e0279535

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTeaching is considered a high-risk profession due to the high impact of occupational risk factors which can endanger educators' mental health and lead to burnout syndrome. This study aimed to examine whether the capacity for mentalizing in teachers explains the degree of their burnout syndrome. The expectation was that a low capacity for mentalizing increases the degree of burnout.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 823 teachers. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey was used to examine the burnout syndrome. The capacity for mentalizing was examined using hypomentalizing and hypermentalizing scales from the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire.ResultsThe expectation that a low capacity for mentalizing increases teachers' burnout confirms the finding that hypomentalizing is a positive predictor of their emotional exhaustion as a dimension of burnout (ß = 0.09; p ConclusionsCapacity for mentalizing and burnout syndrome in teachers are interrelated phenomena. With a good capacity for mentalizing, emotional exhaustion and burnout in teachers are reduced. Knowledge and skills that enable a good capacity for mentalizing should be included in educational and teacher training programs.