Serological Assays Reveal No Evidence of Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection in US Cattle

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to pose a significant threat to public health. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates the capacity to infect various non-human animal species, including both captive and free-living animals. Earlier experimental studies revealed low susceptibility of domestic cattle (Bos taurus) to ancestral B.1 lineage; however, recent experimental findings indicate greater permissiveness of cattle to SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. While some studies detected evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cattle in Italy, Germany, India, and Nigeria, currently, there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in US cattle. We have investigated over 600 samples, including pre-pandemic and pandemic cattle sera collected from Pennsylvania for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Since serological tests have inherent problems of false positives and negatives, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of multiple serological assays. As there are no known SARS-CoV-2 positive cattle serum samples, we used hyperimmune serum raised in cattle with SARS-CoV-2-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) as positive control for the test validation. We found that pseudovirus neutralization assays with a luciferase reporter system can produce false positive results, and care must be taken to interpret serological diagnosis using these assays. We found no serological evidence of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission among cattle in the US. This study underscores the importance of robust evaluation when employing serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection in cattle populations.

Keywords

• SARS-CoV-2
• cattle
• antibodies
• diagnostics
• surveillance